Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Nascar to scrutinize "start an parks" closer


Admin/Mod/Eyewitness

Status: Offline
Posts: 10999
Date:
Nascar to scrutinize "start an parks" closer


From Jayski.com:

NASCAR scrutinizing start and park team reasons UPDATE: NASCAR wont create a hard-line rule prohibiting Sprint Cup teams from starting a race and then parking their car a few laps later, but NASCAR Vice President of Competition Robin Pemberton said Friday there is an increased emphasis on making sure that the reason a team gives for falling out of the race is legitimate. Although there are only 36 cars that have the funding to run the entire season, several teams are trying to make races each week. In past years, when there havent been 43 fully funded cars, some drivers started the race, parked in the opening laps and pocketed the last-place money. We owe it to the garage area [to make sure] that everybody is on the up-and-up, Pemberton said in the Atlanta Motor Speedway garage Friday. When they call [theyre] out, we will continue to look at what put those cars at. What were going to encourage at this level here is that people participate and do what they can do to race. What we want to prevent is someone legitimately trying to do a race setup and getting bumped out by somebody that may have gone above and beyond what the spirit of the rules are. Pemberton said NASCAR doesnt expect every team to be able to run up front, but those that make the final 43 need to be on the track racing someone. Theres people that arent top-10 cars but they compete against other people that are 25th through 35th, Pemberton said. We need to encourage those guys to race each other. As far as the Nationwide and Truck events, where there have traditionally been start-and-park racers over the last few years, Pemberton said there could be a little more leniency. Theres more at stake with the purses and whatever else that goes on [in Cup], but we are going to encourage the level of competition throughout the ranks the best that we can, Pemberton said.(SceneDaily)(3-6-2009)


UPDATE:
That panic attack combined with the weakness implied by having a less than full field forced NASCAR to do whatever it could simply to bring teams to the race track. At Atlanta, an anonymous Truck Series driver also told Frontstretch that NASCAR had contacted them personally about running a Fontana start and park a choice they decided not to make after NASCAR figured out theyd have enough trucks without them making an unscheduled trip to California. NASCAR came to me and said they wanted more cars, they wanted to park, said the owner/driver. [So] we were going to go out there [Fontana] and do a start and parkfor NASCAR.(Frontstretch)(3-11-2009)

__________________


Admin/Mod/Eyewitness

Status: Offline
Posts: 10999
Date:

More from Jayski.com:

More on the "Start and Park": How closely will NASCAR watch for "start and park" teams in this time of less than fully funded fields in Cup races? And how harshly will NASCAR deal with them? That depends on who you talk to within NASCAR. Vice president of competition Robin Pemberton largely confirms what scenedaily.com began reporting Friday: that NASCAR is watching closely. But two officials with higher seniority are taking a more benign posture.
Jim Hunter, NASCAR's veteran vice president for corporate communications, wonders how and why NASCAR could enforce start and park. And NASCAR president Mike Helton doesn't even like to use the term "start and park" anyway. Could NASCAR actually prove a driver has parked, not for mechanical reasons stated, but to save money and still collect the minimum prize to start? "Sure we can," Pemberton said Sunday. "If somebody says the motor was sputtering due to a fuel-pump problem, we can take it apart and look at it." Bottom line, "We're encouraging people to come in and race," Pemberton said.


But, said Hunter, "It's not an issue that's paramount to the success or failure of an event, so why is it an issue [at all]." Said Helton, "I don't look at them as start and parks. I look at them as teams and drivers that are trying to figure out how to get into the sport, and that's a good thing. People talk about start and park as a negative thing, so I don?t like to use that term. "I think of it more as people who have an opportunity," Helton said. "Maybe they're not up to speed yet. Maybe they're not quite capable of doing things that they want to do one day. And this is the way they get started." Helton agrees that "What Robin was referring to, we're watching to be sure that that [getting started] is the intent of these owners."
"If you were going to label somebody a start-and-parker, you would have to understand his financial situation," Hunter says. "Does the guy who might do it this week and not do it next week? Does he have the money to buy tires to really race?" It's race by race, case by case, so that there are so many factors that I don't think it's an issue," Hunter said.(ESPN Insider)(3-12-2009)

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard